Thursday, 8 November 2012

DONT WATCH IT : JAB TAK HAIN JAAN , DONATE MONEY TO DALITS

EK INDIAN LADKE KO LONDON MEIN PYAR
HO JATA HAI…



.
.
.
.
WO LADKI KO PROPOSE KARTA HAI…



.
.
.
.
LADKI MANA KER DETI HAI WO
KEHTI HAI KI WO DONO SIRF DOST
HAIN…
.
.
.
.
LADKE KA DIL TOOT JATA HAI AUR
WO VAPIS INDIA AA JATA HAI APNE
PITAJI KA SAPNA POORA KERNE…
.
.
.



INDIA MEIN WO AAKE ARMY JOIN
KAR LETA HAI AUR BHARAT MAA KI
SEVA KARTE KARTE EK INDIAN REPORTER KI
JAAN BACHATA HAI…
.




.
.
.
AUR
USKO FIR SE PYAR HO
JATA HAI…
.
.
.
.
WO REPORTER KO PROPOSE KARTA



HAI REPORTER BHI VAHI KEHTI HAI KI
HUM SIRF DOST HAIN… (lolzzz)
.
.
.
.
USKA DIL FIR SE TOOT JATA HAI
.
.
.
.
EK DIN LONDON WALI LADKI AUR
INDIA KI REPORTER KO FEEL HOTA
HAI KI UN DONO KO SACH MEIN US
LADKE SE PYAR HO GAYA THA…
.
.
.
.
WO DONO USKE PAAS JATI
HAIN LEKIN TAB TAK LADKA MAR
CHUKA HOTA HAI

MORAL: JAB TAK HAI JAAN… JABTAK HAI JAAN… JAB TAK HAI JAAN…

Diwali mein kuch achcha karo…
Yeh movie dekhne ke wajay woh paisa garibon me baant do…
Aur Diwali se pehle bhi kuch achcha karo…
Sab ko yeh message forward karo… aur apne doston kuch achcha karne ka mouka do…

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

Love all animals.

Buddha taught us to love all animals. But Muhammad taught us to hate everyone. His hatred towards non-muslims, buddhists is well known fact.
But his hatred was not limited alone to kafirs, he hated almost all animals like donkeys, lizard, sankes, dogs etc.
Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. Lets find out his hatredness towards dog in this article and be-aware of such people who treat us like dogs.

Here are some of the hadiths which discuss about Dogs :


DOGS AND ANGELS

Bukhari 4.539:
Narrated Abu Talha:
The Prophet said, "Angels do not enter a house witch has either a dog or a picture in it."



DOGS AND THE LOST HEAVENLY REWARDS
Bukhari 4.541:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "If somebody keeps a dog, he loses one Qirat (of the reward) of his good deeds everyday, except if he keeps it for the purpose of agriculture or for the protection of livestock. "

KILL ALL THE DOGS!
Muslim, Book 010, Number 3813:
Abu Zubair heard Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with him) saying: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered us to kill dogs, and we carried out this order so much so that we also kill the dog coming with a woman
from the desert. Then Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) forbade their killing. He (the Holy Prophet further) said: It is your duty the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes), for it is a devil.

BLACK DOGS ARE THE DEVIL!
Muslim, Book 004, Number 1032:
Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of 'Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him
(a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog. I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog?
He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.

This hadith made us doubt about the character of angels :

Hadith - Muslim, Narrated Maymunah
One morning Allah's Messenger  was silent with grief. Maymunah said: Allah's Messenger, I find a change in your mood today. Allah's Messenger  said: Gabriel had promised me that he would meet me last night, but he did not meet
me. By Allah, he never broke his promises; and Allah's Messenger  spent the day in this sad (mood). Then it occurred to him that there had been a puppy under their cot. He gave an order and it was turned out. He then took some
water in his hand and sprinkled it on the place. When it was evening Gabriel met him and he said to him: You promised me that you would meet me the previous night. He said: Yes, but we do not enter a house in which there is a
dog or a picture. So the very next morning he commanded the dogs to be killed. He announced that the dog kept for the orchards should also be killed, but he spared the dog used for the protection of extensive fields (or big gardens).

After this we doubt that angel Gabriel was a thief who used to visit Muhammad at nights to collect the share of amount from Muhammads raids, loot etc because Gabriel only brought those revealations to Muhammad.

Why should we kill dogs? Buddha had said that it is a sin to kill animals. But Muhammad asked his followers to kill dogs. Probably when Muhammad used to go for looting others the pet dogs of those people might have attacked
Muhammad, which made him to tell all these things.




We being followers of Indian tradition believe in Buddhas ahimsa and we love all animals equally.
Even our dalit hero Ambedkar used to love dogs. He had kept many dogs as pet. Then why should we kill dogs?







Recently after watching Dharmendra's movie we even doubt that Dharmendra also got revealation and inspiration from Islam.
So only he uses dailogues like "Kutte tera khoon pilunga" etc. He also didnot follow Buddha dhamma of respecting all lives. So only he is now suffering by not having any movies in his hand.



Lets all  be compassionate to all living beings and follow dhamma.
Namo Buddhay. 

Monday, 12 March 2012

Dalit VedaVyasa's Prophecy of Mahamada in Bhavishya Purana

It is a well known fact that we were not at all dalits from old times. In our motherland Bharata we were having full rights and privileges. We had many sages and saints from low class who by their virtue of dedication and austerities became great sages. But it was after the advent of Islam we lost our rights. And these muslims are cheating us by telling that they provide us equality. Are we fools to believe in them? We know that we lost our status and became dalits only after Islamic invasion. These idiots for the sake of collecting taxes(jizya) have made us dailts and also brought birth based division.


In recent times we were given some books and CD's by a Muslim and he asked us to read it and convert to Islam.  But after reading it we came to know the reality and we were forced to write this article series just for protecting India from getting Islamized. We never ever give up our hero Ambedkar's Constitution,which is based on democracy and accept the Islamic law, which is based on hypocracy.







The main aim of Zakir Naiks works was proving his prophet Muhammed in a puran named Bhavishya Puran. If at all he believes in Puranas he must accept dalitism because the puranas are attributed to our dalit sage VedVyas.  Our question is if our sage VedVyas can prophecize Muhammed in Puranas, long before muhammed came; we think that our sage VedVyas is greater than Allah, because Allah couldnot stop Satan from cheating Adam. Was Allah not aware of future? If that be the case our dalit hero VedVyas is a greater person as he has already said about upcoming events!



At first when we read the article realted to Muhammed in Bhavishya Puran we were astonished and felt very happy about our hero VedVyas. It also made us to cross verify the things and when we checked that, we were shocked to know how Mahamada of Bhavishya Purana cheated Indians and said that he will create a demonic religion. Now after reading such things should we dalits convert to Islam? Are they thinking that dalits will also convert and become Rakshas?



Here we quote verse by verse translation of some extracts of Bhavishya Puran and show how our great dalit VedVyas had already warned us about Mahamada.

etasminnantare mleccha aacaaryayena samanvitam
mahaamad iti khyaatah shishya shaakhaa samanvitah

At that time a mleccha acarya, famous by the name Mahamada(Prophet Mohammad), dwelt there accompanied by his followers.


raatrau sa devaruupashca bahumaayavishaaradah
paishaacam dehamaasthaaya bhojaraajam hi soabravit

At night, he (Mohammad) of angelic disposition, this shrewd man in the guise of a Pishacha [a desert spirit or jinn], spoke to Bhoja Raja(our Indian King).


aaryayadharmohi te raajansarvadharmottamah smritah
iishaagyayaa karishyaami paishaaca dharma daarunam

O Raja! Your Arya Dharma has been considered to be the best of all religions, but according to the commandments of the Supreme Controler, I shall enforce the strong creed of the Pishachas.




Note here Mahamada himself accepts that our Indian Arya Dharma was the greatest of all. Even our Dalit hero Buddha was an Arya(noble). By following Arya Dhamma we also are noble.






lingacchedii shikhaahinah shmashrudhaari sa dushakah
uccaalaapii sarva bhakshi bhavishyati jano mama

My followers will see to it that men are circumcised and that they wear no shikha on their heads. Instead they will wear beards.They will call out loudly in their prayers. They will eat all things.

binaa kaala caa pashavaasteshaaam bhakshyaa mataa mama
naimusaleva samskaarah kushariva bhavishyati

According to my teachings, they will eat all animals except swine. They will not seek purification by sitting on Kusha grass, rather their purification will come by warfare(Musal).

We know that our hero Buddha had long before asked people to avoid himsa, but this Muhammed polluted our Bodhi Dhamma.

tasmaanmusalavanto hi jaatayo dharmadushakaah
iti paishaaca dharmashca bhavishyati maya krutah

They shall be known as Musal because of their battles with irreligious nations, and I shall be known as the originator of this pisaca-dharma.

These people are demons who destroyed our Bamiyan Buddha temple. We never forgive such demons.

We thank Zakir Naik and his associates for making us dalits proud of our dhamma and feel great about our dalit hero VedVyas who had warned us about pisaacha dhamma.
If at all Muslims really want to help us, we request them to accept Buddha Dhamma and rebuild our Bamiyan temple and leave the pisach dhamma founded by Mahamada.

Saturday, 10 March 2012

बाबा साहब भीम राव अंबेडकर हिंदू-मुस्लिम एकता पर विचार

बाबा साहब भीम राव अंबेडकर 
हिन्दू मुस्लिम एकता एक अंसभव कार्य हैं भारत से समस्त मुसलमानों को पाकिस्तान भेजना और हिन्दुओं को वहां से बुलाना ही एक हल है । यदि यूनान तुर्की और बुल्गारिया जैसे कम साधनों वाले छोटे छोटे देश यह कर सकते हैं तो हमारे लिए कोई कठिनाई नहीं । साम्प्रदायिक शांति हेतु अदला बदली के इस महत्वपूर्ण कार्य को न अपनाना अत्यंत उपहासास्पद होगा । विभाजन के बाद भी भारत में साम्प्रदायिक समस्या बनी रहेगी । पाकिस्तान में रुके हुए अल्पसंख्यक हिन्दुओं की सुरक्षा कैसे होगी ? मुसलमानों के लिए हिन्दू काफिर सम्मान के योग्य नहीं है । मुसलमान की भातृ भावना केवल मुसमलमानों के लिए है । कुरान गैर मुसलमानों को मित्र बनाने का विरोधी है , इसीलिए हिन्दू सिर्फ घृणा और शत्रुता के योग्य है । मुसलामनों के निष्ठा भी केवल मुस्लिम देश के प्रति होती है । इस्लाम सच्चे मुसलमानो हेतु भारत को अपनी मातृभूमि और हिन्दुओं को अपना निकट संबधी मानने की आज्ञा नहीं देता । संभवतः यही कारण था कि मौलाना मौहम्मद अली जैसे भारतीय मुसलमान भी अपेन शरीर को भारत की अपेक्षा येरूसलम में दफनाना अधिक पसन्द किया । कांग्रेस में मुसलमानों की स्थिति एक साम्प्रदायिक चौकी जैसी है । गुण्डागर्दी मुस्लिम राजनीति का एक स्थापित तरीका हो गया है । इस्लामी कानून समान सुधार के विरोधी हैं । धर्म निरपेक्षता को नहीं मानते । मुस्लिम कानूनों के अनुसार भारत हिन्दुओं और मुसलमानों की समान मातृभूमि नहीं हो सकती । वे भारत जैसे गैर मुस्लिम देश को इस्लामिक देश बनाने में जिहाद आतंकवाद का संकोच नहीं करते ।
-प्रमाण सार डा अंबेडकर सम्पूर्ण वाग्मय , खण्ड १५१

DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM


Dalits will never forget that they were wiped out from Afganistan-Bihar by the cruel Muslim invaders. Dr. Ambedkar reminded us who is our brother

FOLLOWING ARE THE QUOTES BY DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM
 

All quotations are from pakistan or the parition of india by Dr B.R.Ambedkar, 3rd edition ,1946 BAWS Vol. 8,1990 , govt of maharastra publication; previous name of the book: Thoughts on Pakistan
 
Hindu is a Kafir-Not worthy of respect-

"To the muslims, a Hindu (and any non-muslim) is a Kafir. A Kafir (non-believer in islam) is not worthy of respect. He is a low born and without status. That is why a country ruled by the Kafir (Non-muslim) is a Dar-ul-Harb (i.e. the land of war) to a Muslim, which must be conquered, by any means for the muslims and turned into Dar-ul-Islam (i.e. land of muslims alone). Given this, no further evidence seems necessary to prove that the muslims will not obey a Hindu (or for that matter any non- muslim) government "
Ref-page 301
Brotherhood of muslims for the muslims only-

"Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between muslims and non-muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of islam is not the universal brotherhood of 
man.It is the brotherhood of muslims for muslims only. There is fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation.For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.
The second defect of islam is that it is a system of social self-government, because the allegiance of a muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. To the muslim ibi bene patria is unthinkable.wherever- there is the rule of islam, there is his own country.
In other words, Islam can never allow a true muslim to adopt india as his motherland and regard a hindu as his kith and kin. that is probably the reason why maulana Mahomed Ali, a great indian but a true muslim, preferred to be buried in jerusalem rather than in india.'
(Ref-page 330-331)

Difficult to see difference between a communal and nationalist muslim:

"It is difficult to see any real difference between the communal muslims who form the Muslim league and the nationalist muslims. It is extremely doubtful whether the nationalist musalmans have any real community of sentiment, aim and policy with the congress which mark them off from the muslim league. Indeed many Congressmen are alleged to hold the view that there is no different between the two and that the nationalist muslim inside the congress are only an outpost of the communal muslims"
ref- page 408
Muslim invaders planted the seeds of Islam in India.

"The muslim invaders, no doubt, came to india singing a hymn of hate against the hindus, but, they did not merely sing their hymn of hate and go back burning a few temples on the way. That would have been a blessing. they were not content with so negative a result. They did a positive act,namely, to plant the seed of islam. The growth of this plant is remarkable. It is not a summer sapling. It is as great and as stronger as an oak. Its growth is thickest in northern india. The successive invasions have deposited their 'silt' served as watering exercises of devoted gardners, its growth is so thick in northern india that the remnants of hindu and buddhist culture are just shurbs. Even the sikh axe could not fell this oak"
Ref page- 65

Muslim's strategy in politics:

"The third thing that is noticeable is teh adoption by the muslims of the gangster's method in politics. The riots are a sufficient indication that gangsterism has become a setteled part of their strategy in poliics"
Ref page- 269

Murderers are religious martyrs

"But whether the number of prominent hindus killed by fanatic muslims is large or small mattes little. What matters is the attitude of those who count towards these murderes. The murderers paid the penalty of law where law is enforced. The leading moslems, however , never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs and agitation was carried on for clemency being shown to 
them.As an illustration of this attitude, one may refer to Mr. Barkat Ali , a barrister of lahore, who argued the appeal of Abdul Qayum. He went to the length of saying that qayum was not guilty of murder of Nathuramal because his act was justificable by the law of the Koran. This attitude of the moslems is quite understandable.what is not understandable is the attitude of Mr. Gandhi '
Ref page 157

Hindus and muslims are two distinct spritual species from aspritual point of view, Hindus and Musalmans are not merely two classes or two sects such as protestants and catholics or Shaivas and Vaishnavas. They are two distinct species.

page 193

Islam and Castism

"Everybody infers that islam must be free from slavery and caste. Regarding slavery nothing needs to be said. It stands aboloshed now by law. But while it existed much of its support was derived from islam and islamic countries."
But if slavery has gone, caste among musalmans has remained, as an illustration one may take the conditions prevalent among the bengal muslims. The superitendent of the census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the muslims of bengal:- 

The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes- sheikh, saiad, moghul and pathan- has very little application to this province (bengal). the mahomedans themselves recognize two main social divisions, (1) ashraf or sharaf and (2) ajlaf. ashraf means noble and includes all undoubted descendents of foreigners and converts from high castes hindus. all other mahamedans including the occupational groups and all converts of lower ranks ,a re known by the contemptous-terms. 'ajlab', 'wretches' or 'mean people': they are also called kamina or itar, 'base' or rasil, a corruption of rizal, "worthless'. in some places a third class, called arzal or lowest of all is added. with them no other mohomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground. 
"within these groups there are castes with sovial precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the hindus."
1.     ashraf or better class mahomedans.
(1) saiads (2) sheikhs (3) pathans (4) moghul (5) malik and (6) mirza

2. ajlaf or lower class mahomedans.
(1) cultivating sheikhs, and other who were originally hindus but do not belong to any functional group, and have not gained admittance to the ashraf community e.g. pirali and thakrai 
(2) darzi, jolaha, fakir and rangrez
(3) brahi, bhathiara, cluk, chrihar, dai, dhawa, dhunia, gaddi, kalal, kasai, kula, kunjara, laheri, mahifarosh, mallah, naliya, nikari.
(4) abdal, bako, bediya, bhat , chamba, dafali,dhobi, hallam, mucho, nagarchi, nat, panwari, madaria,tuntia.

3. arzal or degraded class.
bhanar, halalkhor, hijra, kasbi, lalbegi, mougtra, mehtar.
similar facts from other provinces of india could be gathered from their respective census reports and those who are curious may refer to them. but the facts for bengal are enough to show that the mahamoedans observed not only caste but also untouchability
page- 228-230

Muslim canon oppose social reform 

The existance of these evils among the muslims is distressing enough. But far more distressing is the fact that there is no organized movement of social reform among the musalmans of india on a scale sufficient to bring about their eradication. The hindus have their social evils. But there is relieving feature about them namely, that some of them are conscious of their existance and a few of them are actively agitating for their removal. Indeed, they oppose any change in their existing practices. it is noteworthy that the muslims opposed the child marriage bill brought in the central assembly in 1930, whereby the age for marriage of a girl was raised to 14 and for a boy to 18 on the ground that it was opposed to the muslim canon law. Not only did they oppose the bill at every stage but that when it became law they started a campaign of civil disobedience against that act
Ref page-233

Muslim politicians oppose secular categories: "muslim politicians do not recognize secular categories of life as the basis of their politics because to them it means the weakening of the community in it fight against the hindus. The poor muslims will not join the poor hindus to get justice from the rich. Muslim tenants will not join hindu tenants to prevent the tyranny of the landlord. Muslim labourers will not join hindu labourers in the fight of labour against the capitalist. Why? the answer is simple. The poor muslims sees that if he joins in the fight of the poor against the rich, he may be fighting against a rich muslim. the muslim labourer feels that if he joins in the onslaught of labour against capitalist he will be injuring a muslim mill-owner. He is conscious that any injury to a rich muslim, to a muslim landlord or to a muslim mill-owner, is a disservice to the muslim community, for it is thereby weakened in ots struggle against the hindu community "

Ref page -236

India cannot be common motherland of the hindus and muslims as per muslim laws: 

According to muslim canon law the world is divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (abode of islam) and dar-ul-harb (adobe of war). a country is dar-ul-islam when it is ruled by muslims. a country is dar-ul-harb when muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. that being the canon law of the muslims, india cannot be the common motherland of the hindus and the musalmans. it can be the land of the musalmans- but it cannot be the land of the 'hindus and musalmans living as equals'. Further, it can be the land of the musalmans only when it is governed by the muslims. the moment the land become subject to the authoritynof a non-muslim power, it ceases to be the lnd of the muslims. instead of being dar-ul-islam it becomes dar-ul-harb.
I must not be supposed that this view is only of academic interest. For it is capable of becoming an active force capable of influencing the conduct of the muslims.


Ref- page 294

Jihad to transform dar-ul-harb india to dar-ul-islam

It might also be mentioned that hijrat is not the only way of escape to muslims who find themselves in adar-ul-harb. there is another injunction of muslim canon law called jihad (crusade) by which it beomes incument on a muslim ruler to extend the rules of islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (adobe of islam) , dar-ul-harb (adobe of war), all countries come under one category or the other. technically , it is the duty of the muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform dar-ul-harb into dar-ul-islam.

The fact remains that india, if not exclusively under muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the musalmans, according to the tenents of islam are justified in procaliming a jihad.
The fact remains that india, if not exclusively under muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the muslamns, according to the tenets of islam are justified in proclaiming a jihad.
not only can they proclaim jihad but they can call the aid of a foriegn muslim power to make jihad success, or if the foreign muslim power intents to proclaim a jihad, help that power in making its endeavour a succs.

Ref-page 295-296

Why is hindu-muslim unity a failure?

"the real explanation of this failure of hindu-muslim unity lies in the failure to realize that what stands between the hindus and muslims is not a mere matter of difference , and that this antagonism is not to be attributed to material cause. it is formed by causes which take their origin in historical, religious, cultural and social antipathy, of which political antipathy is only a reflection."
Ref- page 329

Hindu-muslim unity is out of sight

Nothing i could say can so well show the futility of any hope of hindu-muslim unity. Hindu -Muslim unity upto now was at least in sight although it was like a mirage. today it is out of sight and also out of mind. even mr gandhi has given up what, he perheps now realizes,is an impossible task.

Ref- page 187

Transfer of minorities is the only remedy for communal peace.

"the transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace, is beyond doubt. if that is so, there is no reason why the hindus and the muslims should keep on trading in safeguards which have proved so unsafe. if small countries, with limited resources like greece, turkey and bulgaria, were capable of such an undertaking there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by indians"

The problem of majority-minority will continue

"the musalmans are scattered all over hindustan-though they are mostly congregated in towns and no ingenuity in the matter of redrawing of boundaries can make it homogenous. the only way to make hindustan homogenous, is to arrange for exchange of polulation. until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of pakistan , the problem of majority vs minority will remain in hindustan asbefore and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of hindustan